![]() ![]() Plus, as before, this portion of the armor makes up a fairly small portion of the frontal profile. We don't know how thick it is, and thus there's no way to determine how vulnerable it is. Upper glacis is still going to have the same problem as an Abrams due to modern APFSDS can still bite into low thickness roof armour. It is present on essentially every tank with a pronounced bustle and/or turret face to one degree or another. The gap serves to give better clearance of the turret over the hull, reducing the chance of jamming. Huge gap between the turret, turret ring, and the hull for rounds to jam into.Īgain, if an enemy can place that shot, then they are either very skilled or that tank is very unlucky. The suggestion that the engineers and others who worked on the tank wouldn't have taken this into consideration is, frankly, insulting. But given the fact that engagements take place at range and gunnery is still a matter of "aim center mass and fire", issues with the mantlet become more a matter of statistical probability than some great Achilles heel. Yes, some areas may be more vulnerable than others. ![]() Slope Multipliers Posts: Tiger vs T-34 vs M4A3E8, Tiger vs M4A3E8 (angled at 45°), Tiger vs Panther vs M4A3E8, T-34 vs Tiger I vs M4A1.īased on what knowledge, exactly? We don't know the armor behind the mantlet it could be pretty significant for all we know.īeyond that, the concept of individual "weak spots" on tanks isn't really a thing. ![]() YouTubers that run armour penetration simulations
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |